MANILA, Philippines — The camp of Department of Public Works and Highways (DPWH) District Engineer Henry Alcantara denied accusations linking him to alleged ghost flood control projects in Bulacan, insisting he had no hand in the supposed scheme., This news data comes from:http://qcgyje.gangzhifhm.com
In a statement issued over the weekend, the Flaminiano Arroyo & Dueñas law firm, which represents Alcantara, said its client “maintains his innocence: he did not author these alleged ghost projects. Any wrongdoing was done behind his back, without his knowledge, acquiescence, or approval.”
DPWH engineer denies role in Bulacan flood control ‘ghost projects’

The statement directly counters claims that Alcantara was the “kingpin” of the controversial projects, which authorities are now investigating for possible irregularities.
“Engr. Alcantara will contest every accusation that he had supposedly participated in and/or benefitted from any unlawful scheme,” the law firm said, adding that he would exhaust all legal remedies, including challenging his summary dismissal from service.
DPWH engineer denies role in Bulacan flood control ‘ghost projects’
The camp also vowed Alcantara’s cooperation with the ongoing investigation. “He will continue to assist the authorities in the investigation of these flood control ghost projects. We are confident that in due time, the truth will surface and Engr. Alcantara will be cleared of the baseless accusations levied against him,” the statement read.
- Japan gives Philippine justice system a boost
- WorldSkills Asean Manila begins
- Ukraine says Russia linked to lawmaker's killing
- DOJ indicts Abra Mining for fraudulent trading
- Supreme Court censures Marikina judge over parking dispute with PAO lawyer
- 2,000 North Korean troops killed in Russia deployment: Seoul spy agency
- Mexican drug lord faces life in prison after pleading guilty in US court
- North Korea test-fires two 'new' air defense missiles
- Metro Manila floods strand commuters, disrupt classes
- Bersamin letter proves Torre reassignments ‘valid’